The Impact of Surgical Timing in Orbital Fracture Repair: A New Paradigm.

PURPOSE: For decades, there has been an ongoing debate about the ideal timing of orbital fracture repair (OFR) in adults. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent OFR at two centers (2015-2019). Excluded were patients <18 years old and those with follow-up <2 weeks. Our primary outcome was the incidence/persistence of postoperative enophthalmos/diplopia at least 2 weeks following OFR. The association between surgical timing and postoperative ocular complications was assessed in patients with extraocular muscle (EOM) entrapment, enophthalmos and/or diplopia, and different fracture sizes. RESULTS: Of n=253 patients, n=13 (5.1%) had preoperative EOM entrapment. Of these, patients who had OFR within 2 days of injury were less likely to develop postoperative diplopia compared with patients who had OFR within 8-14 days (n=1/8 [12.5%], n=3/3 [100%]; P=0.018). Patients who had OFR for near-total defects within 1 week of injury were significantly less likely to have postoperative enophthalmos (n=0 [0.0%]) compared with those who had surgery after 2 weeks (n=2 [33.3%] after 15 to 28 days, n=8 [34.8%] after 28 days from injury, P<0.001). Patients who had delayed OFR for large fractures smaller than near-total defects, preoperative persistent diplopia, or enophthalmos were not at significantly greater likelihood of postoperative ocular complications compared with those who had early OFR. CONCLUSION: We recommend OFR within 2 days of injury for EOM entrapment and 1 week for near-total defects. Surgical delay up to at least 4 weeks is possible in case of less severe fractures, preoperative persistent diplopia, or enophthalmos.

Orbital Fracture Characteristics and Outcomes in Baltimore.

Fracture characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients presenting with orbital fractures in Baltimore remain poorly investigated. The purpose of our study was to determine the fracture patterns, etiologies, and postoperative outcomes of patients treated for orbital fractures at 2 level I trauma centers in Baltimore. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent orbital fracture repair at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center and the Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019. Of 374 patients, 179 (47.9%) had orbital fractures due to violent trauma, 252 (67.4%) had moderate to near-total orbital fractures, 345 (92.2%) had orbital floor involvement, and 338 (90.4%) had concomitant neurological symptoms/signs. Almost half of the patients had at least one postoperative ocular symptom/sign [n = 163/333 (48.9%)]. Patients who had orbital fractures due to violent trauma were more likely to develop postoperative ocular symptoms/signs compared with those who had orbital fractures due to nonviolent trauma [n = 88/154 (57.1%), n = 75/179 (41.9%); P = 0.006]. After controlling for factors pertaining to injury severity, there was no significant difference in patient throughput or incidence of any postoperative ocular symptom/sign after repair between the two centers. Timely management of patients with orbital fractures due to violent trauma is crucial to mitigate the risk of postoperative ocular symptoms/signs.

Development and validation of a risk calculator for postoperative diplopia following orbital fracture repair in adults.

Postoperative diplopia is the most common complication following orbital fracture repair (OFR). Existing evidence on its risk factors is based on single-institution studies and small sample sizes. Our study is the first multi-center study to develop and validate a risk calculator for the prediction of postoperative diplopia following OFR. We reviewed trauma patients who underwent OFR at two high-volume trauma centers (2015-2019). Excluded were patients < 18 years old and those with postoperative follow-up < 2 weeks. Our primary outcome was incidence/persistence of postoperative diplopia at ≥ 2 weeks. A risk model for the prediction of postoperative diplopia was derived using a development dataset (70% of population) and validated using a validation dataset (remaining 30%). The C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to assess the risk model accuracy. A total of n = 254 adults were analyzed. The factors that predicted postoperative diplopia were: age at injury, preoperative enophthalmos, fracture size/displacement, surgical timing, globe/soft tissue repair, and medial wall involvement. Our predictive model had excellent discrimination (C-statistic = 80.4%), calibration (P = 0.2), and validation (C-statistic = 80%). Our model rules out postoperative diplopia with a 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for a probability < 8.9%. Our predictive model rules out postoperative diplopia with an 87.9% sensitivity and a 95.8% NPV for a probability < 13.4%. We designed the first validated risk calculator that can be used as a powerful screening tool to rule out postoperative diplopia following OFR in adults.

A 10-Year Retrospective Review on the Use of Prophylactic Spinal Reconstruction in Spinal Surgery Involving High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: Spinal surgeries are being offered to a broader patient population who are both medically and surgically complex. History of prior spinal surgery, advanced age, and presence of comorbidities, such as obesity, malnutrition, steroid use, and tobacco use, are risk factors for postoperative complications. Prophylactic spinal reconstruction at the time of spinal surgery has been shown to have improved outcomes and decreased wound complications; however, outcomes focusing specifically on complex patients with a history of previous spinal surgery (or surgeries) have not been well described. METHODS: This is a retrospective study performed at the University of Maryland Medical Center (Baltimore, MD) of high-risk patients who underwent complex spinal surgery with prophylactic spinal reconstruction from 2011 to 2022. One hundred forty-three consecutive surgeries from 136 patients were included in the study. Patients younger than 17 years or who had an incomplete medical record were excluded. RESULTS: Most patients were female (63.6%) versus male (31.5%). The average American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3. All but 6 patients (11%) had a history of at least 1 spinal surgery, with nearly half of patients having had between 2 and 5 spinal surgeries. Reconstruction was performed with paraspinous flaps in most cases (n = 133 [93%]). The overall complication rate was 10.5%, with surgical site infection being the most common complication. Seventeen patients (12.5%) underwent reoperation within 90 days of initial surgery. Average length of follow-up was 4.18 months (range, 0.03-40.53 months). CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients, prophylactic spinal reconstruction offers improved outcomes with decreased wound complications compared with salvage. For large defects, paraspinous flaps are recommended over other reconstructive options. Prolonged drain placement is felt to be protective against complications.

Predictors of Postoperative Diplopia Following Orbital Fracture Repair in Adults.

PURPOSE: Postoperative diplopia is reported in up to 52% of orbital bone fracture (OBF) repair. Evidence on these risk factors is based on low-quality data, single-institution studies, and small sample sizes. Our study is the largest and first multi-center study to determine the predictors of postoperative diplopia following OBF repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent OBF repair at two centers from 2015 to 2019. Our primary outcome was the incidence or persistence of postoperative diplopia at least 2 weeks following OBF repair. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine significant predictors of postoperative diplopia. RESULTS: Of 254 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 36.1 (27.8-50.7) years, and the median (IQR) follow-up was 79.5 (40.3-157.3) days. The most common postoperative ocular symptom was diplopia [n=51/254 (20.1%)]. Patients who had preoperative limited ocular motility or enophthalmos had adjusted odds ratio [aOR] (95% confidence interval [CI]) 2.33 (1.03-5.24) and 2.35 (1.06-5.24) the odds of developing postoperative diplopia, compared to patients who did not have these preoperative symptoms, respectively. Patients who had combined orbital floor and medial wall and moderate OBF (>2 cm2 defect or >3 mm displacement) on preoperative CT scan had aOR (95% CI) 2.16 (1.04-4.46) and 3.77 (1.44-9.83) the odds of developing postoperative diplopia, compared to patients without these preoperative CT findings, respectively. CONCLUSION: During primary assessment of the patient with OBF, preoperative ocular signs and symptoms, fracture severity, and location of OBF are key predictors of postoperative diplopia.

Are We Speaking the Same Language? A Systematic Review on the Use of Consistent Language in Reporting Fat Necrosis in Autologous Fat Grafting of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting is a widely adopted approach to optimize outcomes in breast reconstruction and augmentation. Although fat necrosis is a well-known consequence of autologous fat grafting, it remains inconsistently defined in the literature. In late 2014, the Food and Drug Administration released a draft guidance to restrict future autologous fat grafting-a statement that was permissively modified in late 2017. In the context of evolving guidelines and autologous fat grafting outcome data, the language and descriptions of fat necrosis are inconsistent in the literature. METHODS: Five databases were queried for studies reporting fat necrosis following autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction or augmentation from inception to August 11, 2022. Studies were temporally stratified according to released FDA guidelines: pre-2015, 2015-2017, and 2018-2022. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles met inclusion criteria. Prior to 2015, 6 of 21 studies (28.6%) offered clear definitions of fat necrosis. In contrast, the 2015-2017 period demonstrated an absence of clear fat necrosis definitions (0/13 studies, p = 0.03). Though the 2018-2022 period exhibited a rise in annual publications compared with the pre-2015 period (5.4 vs. 1.9, respectively, p = 0.04), this was not matched by a rise in clear fat necrosis reporting (14.8% studies, p = 0.45). Across all periods, only 16.4% of articles offered clear definitions, which exhibited wide heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Despite the increasing popularity of autologous fat grafting, fat necrosis remains inconsistently defined and described, especially in the context of changing FDA guidelines. This limits the reliable interpretation and application of the current literature reporting fat necrosis outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .